Skip to content

Dusklands – Coetzee’s debut novel

October 13, 2009

Coetzee's first work of fiction
The Debut

Being Coetzee’s first work of fiction, Dusklands marks the signs of a debut work. It consists of two separate narratives set in different times and places, but united by a common theme of racist oppression. The first narrative is set in Vietnam, during the Vietnam War. The U.S. is shown as a colonial power and the Vietnamese are shown to be suffering under its attacks. The protagonist is a captain, who sees the ‘truth’ and tries to convince the authorities to see it too, but predictably fails. Driven into frustration he kills his own son.

In the other narrative, a seventeenth century white explorer leads an expedition in the heart of the native territory. A petty incident is interpreted by him as an attack on the Empire and in a second attack he destroys the entire tribe, including his former servants.

The narratives are hard to read and it’s not easy to keep track of events, especially if we compare it with other works of Coetzee. Language is complex and the reader has certain difficulties in muddling through the text.

Coetzee’s vehement anti-Americanism shows the fervor of 1970s and Coetzee’s own youthful convictions. His leftist sympathies are clear and one feels that the parallels drawn between the apartheid regime of South Africa and the U.S. Government is forced and artificial.

First of all, the blacks have equal rights in the U.S. and the State does not discriminate against them. The apartheid regime had occupied the land of Africa, driven out the natives, killing indiscriminately and extirpating a lot of cultures and tribes. We have no such equivalent in Vietnam War. The U.S. did not kill innocent civilians. It did not displace people by transplanting American people on the Vietnamese land. It did not try to convert the natives.

Secondly, the Vietnam War was initiated by the Communists. Soviet Union and China were the clear aggressors. In a post-1945 world, they had blatantly tried to overrun a free country torturing and massacring thousands of locals who opposed the Communist invaders. The U.S. jumped in only to prevent another country becoming Communist. In the process, it saved Vietnam the pain of a nationwide cultural destruction, like of which China had to suffer during the Cultural Revolution. There were some tactical mistakes on the part of the U.S., but the Vietnam War was a Communist folly. The U.S. had to pay for a crime of communists. It was due to the heavily biased leftist media of the Cold War era, which through selective reporting turned the public opinion of Americans against their own country.

After failing to gain a foothold in Vietnam, KGB’s main focus was to slander America in which it succeeded. Many of the journalists and academicians were on the payroll of the Communists; many others with humanist concerns were swept away in the mass hysteria of 1970s anti-Americanism. Coetzee was one of such gullible humanists.

This work should be seen in this light; keeping in mind that the author had strong leftist sympathies and commitment when he wrote this work.

One Comment leave one →
  1. January 24, 2011 2:17 AM

    I enjoyed your website, thanks. Came upon it whilst looking for something on Tolkien’s views on some of the pretentious literature of his time. Came across your stuff about Mr. Coetzee and as a South African it piqued my interest. Have a grudging love for his way with words. Damn, he can write, but damn his hippy sensitivities. Just want to give the guy a hug and say “cheer up, mate, it’s not so bad”. To his credit he has steadily sidled away from the Left since his first novel and maybe he’ll experience the joy of a McDonalds burger after a night of heavy drinking before he dies. Would pay good money to see it on Youtube.

    Agree with you for the most part but take issue with this claim:

    “The apartheid regime had occupied the land of Africa, driven out the natives, killing indiscriminately and extirpating a lot of cultures and tribes.”

    Afraid that’s as simplistic as the left-leaning media’s portrayal of the Vietnam War. South African history’s a lot more complicated.

    The Nationalist Party government (1948-1994) responsible for Grand Apartheidt were a nasty bunch of jerks but they never engaged in the indiscriminate massacre of black Africans in South Africa. There were forced removals, mostly in urban areas, but their goal was not to extirpate any cultures or tribes; in fact, they hoped to keep blacks “unsullied” by Western culture by passing misguided, condescending laws like the Bantu Education Act. Basically, they would have much preferred blacks throwing spears around than copies of “Das Kapital”. They considered themselves nothing more than ardent multi-culturalists.

    As for “land of Africa” and “natives”, things are a bit more sticky than the old “whites came with guns and collectively mugged blacks”.

    We’ll start with that tricky term “natives”.

    When the Dutch set foot in Cape Town they would have encountered the Khoisan, a completely different branch of humanity, distinct from both blacks and whites. Only when they moved past the Fish River would the Dutch have encountered what I assume you mean by “Africans”.

    Turns out the Khoisan were the aboriginal denizens of the whole of Southern Africa before the mass migrations of Bantu tribes from the Niger-Congo Delta. Slowly displaced, they would likely have been all but wiped out were it not for the relatively fortuitious arrival of a bunch of red-bearded blokes from the otherside of the world, intent on setting up a refuelling station for their trade-ships.

    Today the mixed descendants of the European settlers and the Khoisan are the majority in the Western Cape of South Africa.

    The myth that black people own Africa because they are the most populous group on the continent is like saying the Chinese own Asia because there’s more of them than anyone else. It’s responsible for embarrassing displays of sentimentality and horrible acts of violence.

    Otherwise, keep up the good work! Will be visiting your site again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: